Special Features
Mr. Chairman, members of the House Banking Committee, thank you for the invitation to comment on HR 10. These hearings mark the third consecutive Congress in which financial deregulation has dominated the agenda of this Committee. Thousands of hours of the time of Members of Congress and their staffs have been expended in a futile…
Read MoreEvery discussion of Social Security should begin by recognizing that Social Security is a system of social insurance. It places government in one of its noblest roles: Provision of a bedrock guarantee to all members of society that you do not need to fear the financial consequences of growing old or disabled, for society will…
Read MoreRalph Nader today issued the following statement: The multistate settlement agreement between some state attorneys general and Big Tobacco is plainly a sweetheart deal concocted by the addictive companies’ law firms for the industry. State AGs should reject it. The reported insistence by the industry that states accept the deal on a take-it-or-leave-it basis within…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter Feb./March 1998 Washington Rule # 1 — Never underestimate the ability of Congress to repeat its mistakes. This rule is being played out with a vengeance in the mad rush to ram the financial deregulation package through the House of Representatives before the spring recess. The “act now, think later” stampede…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter Jan. 1998 In recent years, banks, credit card companies and others in the financial industry have been pushing high-cost credit on consumers in a reckless reach for bigger profits. Ed Furash, a banking consultant in Washington, told the New York Times that the entire consumer credit business has been engaged in…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter Dec. 1997 Several presidents of small independent banks have written with complaints that our column (“Eliminating Competition, October 1997) was overly generous to the credit unions and failed to mention key concerns of the banking industry. The issue that prompted the column is the bank-financed lawsuits which seek to eliminate the…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter Oct./Nov. 1997 THE NATION’S BANKING industry, enjoying year after year of record profits and growing political and economic dominance, has a simple corporate strategy about competition — “don’t meet it, just eliminate it.” The industry’s current legal battle against the smallest segment of the financial community in terms of assets —…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter Sept. 1997 For years consumer and community groups have teamed up with progressive members of Congress to push for the establishment of “lifeline” banking accounts that would provide low-income families with basic banking services on affordable terms. Invariably, the pro-bank majorities have been able to sidetrack the proposals. Last year Congress…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter June 1997 In late June, the Banking Committee of the U. S. House of Representatives adopted by anarrow 28 to 26 margin the most far reaching financial legislation since the New Deal. Big news? Not in the eyes of much of the national media which, for the most part, left coverage…
Read MoreFrom The Nader Letter May 1997 Much of the Federal Reserve’s power is based on a storehouse of myths that have been carefully nurtured by successive Fed Chairmen over the years. No myth is longer lasting than the often repeated claim that the Federal Reserve Board must have power over bank regulation in order to…
Read More